Ebenezer
Shields was the tenth child and eighth
son of William and Jane Shields of
Emmitsburg, Maryland.
Born in the
middle years of the American
Revolution, on Tuesday, December 22,
1778, at a time when his oldest
brothers had already reached
adulthood, his early life with his
family was spent among surroundings
and material comforts undoubtedly much
improved over those which the older of
his brothers and sisters had known. By
the time of his birth, his father's
success as a surveyor and entrepreneur
in the development and subdivision of
land had gained for the family a
standing as one of the foremost in the
area, and a mode of life which appear
to have included most of the amenities
then available.
Ebenezer was
eighteen years of age when his father
died in the summer of 1797. Three
years later, in 1800, probate records
of his father's estate indicate that
he received his share of the cash
proceeds of the estate, having
attained his majority in December of
the previous year.
Few sources
exist which provide any details of
Ebenezer's adult life. This is in part
because the years in which he lived -
the so-called National Period - were
historically less eventful and
produced much less of an archival
record than had the Revolutionary
years which preceded them or the
Antebellum and Civil War periods which
were to follow. (The War of 1812,
essentially a series of naval
engagements, had little impact on the
residents of Appalachian Maryland; it
does not appear that Ebenezer's life
was in any way significantly touched
by its events.)
What little is
known of the career of Ebenezer, aside
from that which has survived through
oral family tradition, is that which
may be adduced from his will, written
five or six weeks before his death in
1837. From it, and from the
confirmatory sources to which it
leads, it is evident that he served
for some years as an agent for his
older brother John, executor of his
father's estate, in the management of
several of the Shields land holdings -
including the William Shields portion
of Carrollsburg and a tract known as
Shields' Adventure - which remained
unsold for at least four decades after
William Shields death. This commission
may have devolved to him by default,
since by the time he had reached early
middle age Ebenezer was apparently the
only one of William Shields' children
still residing in Frederick County.
There were, it
should be noted, other members of the
family resident in the area throughout
the period of Ebenezer's adult life,
although all were of the third
generation. Two nephews, sons of his
older brother William, attained
sufficient prominence to be mentioned
in later histories of the area. One,
Jefferson Shields, became a doctor (as
later also did his son John), and was
an early member of the Emmitsburg Fire
Company. Another, Maxwell, was an
elder of
Tom's Creek (later
Emmitsburg) Presbyterian Church; he,
several of his children, and Rebecca,
identified as his "consort," are
buried together in the Presbyterian
Cemetery in Emmitsburg.
It appears
that Ebenezer's standard of living and
general economic situation, while by
no means as substantial as that which
had been attained by his father, and
although he did not distinguish
himself in any known professional
field, was comfortable by the
standards of his time. It is probably
that he derived his livelihood
principally from farming a plot of
land which he had acquired in
Emmitsburg - possibly from holdings
once the property of his father - and
from revenues realized from his
administration of lands which were
still an unliquidated part of his
father's estate.
Perhaps the
most prevalent impression of Ebenezer
held by succeeding generations of his
posterity is that of the family black
sheep. He was, to be sure, the
youngest son of a large and well-to-do
family, child of his father's late
middle age, and heritor of a prominent
name and a portion of the family's
land-based wealth - circumstances
frequently associated with the role of
the prodigal. If he was, indeed, the
prodigal son, the traditional
circumstances of prodigality were
reversed, since all of his brothers
and sisters ultimately left the region
of their birth and upbringing, while
Ebenezer remained on the family
homestead to sow his "wild oats."
Ebenezer's
reputation has been transmitted to
posterity in part by a number of
legends, several of which are still
repeated in the Emmitsburg area:
- 'On dark
moonless nights the ghost of Ebenezer
Shields may often be seen riding
horseback up and down old route 15
south of Emmitsburg.' This story is
generally delivered with inflections
suggesting that Ebenezer was not some
frightening headless horseman, but
rather that he was busily engaged in
his customary pastime of riding from
one amatory appointment to the next.
- 'Ebenezer
gave all his legitimate children
names beginning with the letter 'J'
so he could distinguish them from
the numerous other offspring he
produced without benefit of clergy.'
To be strictly technical, none of
Ebenezer's children were legitimate
by present-day standards.
Additionally, his youngest known son
whom he gave equal standing with the
others named in his will, was called
William.
A somewhat
more accurate, although still
confused, picture of Ebenezer's
domestic arrangements (which appear to
have been highly informal in nature)
emerges from a reading of his will. In
it he conveyed a portion of his estate
to Margaret Morrison, who is described
as his "housekeeper," and who is named
as the mother of three children - John
Henry Shields, Andrew Jackson Shields,
and William Vanburen Shields.
Ebenezer's will charges Margaret with
maintaining a home for the above
children and for Jefferson Shields,
presumably an older child, identified
as the son of one Rachel Robison.
It is known
from accounts transmitted to his
posterity by the writer's
great-grandfather, John Henry Shields,
that the above-named children were
natural sons of Ebenezer. It does not
appear likely, however, that Ebenezer
ever entered into a formal marriage
arrangement with either of the
above-named women. The wording of his
will, the absence of his name from
records of marriage licenses issued
(records which date, in Frederick
County, from the early 1700s), and the
known practices of the time and locale
would all seem to confirm this
conclusion.
In this
connection, it is interesting to note
that a detailed genealogical table
maintained over the years by one or
more of William Shields' descendants
in Tennessee states simply that
Ebenezer "did not marry." Although the
statement is apparently quite
accurate, it is - needless to say -
somewhat misleading in the face of
Ebenezer's considerable posterity
living today.
Reference in
Ebenezer's will to the four boys being
"children by adoption" indicates,
according to historians familiar with
the period, simply that he
acknowledged paternity and gave them
his name. A search of both court and
legislative records for the period of
Ebenezer's adult life reflects no
formal adoption proceedings; it is
likely that the adoption referred to
was completely informal in nature, in
keeping with the custom of the time.
His common-law
relationship with Margaret Morrison
was apparently of long standing. The
nature and duration of that with
Rachel Robison, mother of his son
Jefferson, is not known, although it
would appear to have preceded the
liaison with Margaret Morrison. In
Ebenezer's tie, such relationships
were quite common; in an area where
few, if any, representatives of civil
authority existed, those persons not
belonging to an organized church (and
church records of the time and locale
do not reflect that Ebenezer held
membership in any denomination)
frequently had little recourse but to
enter into marital relationships
without benefit of formal ceremony.
In the case of
Ebenezer, an additional factor may
have been controlling. By the time he
had reached maturity, most of his
brothers and sisters had married,
generally into families of equal or
even greater prominence than that of
the Shields.' It was not expected that
offspring of a family belonging to the
local aristocracy would
indiscriminately bestow the family
name upon individuals from families of
markedly lesser standing. Despite the
nascent democracy of frontier America,
egalitarianism went only so far.
Viewed in this light, Ebenezer's
marital arrangements, rather than
being an affront to his family and to
prevailing morality, may well have
been viewed as highly conventional
under existing circumstances.
The impact of
his pronounced individuality on his
brothers and sisters is not known. To
some of them, married to members of
prominent Maryland families of the
time, his apparent Sybaritic
tendencies may well have been
embarrassing; to others, already
removed to Tennessee and only seldom
in communication with those remaining
in Maryland, his activities were quite
likely matters of little concern.
Ebenezer's agency for the unsettled
portion of his father's estate
suggests that he was not necessarily
estranged from the remainder of the
family; there is much to suggest,
however, that he had little social
contact with - and probably little in
common with - most of his older
brothers and sisters. It is of
interest that the will of his mother,
Jane Williams Shields, probated in
1806, names only her daughter Mary
(Blair) and her son William; neither
Ebenezer nor any of his other brothers
or sisters is mentioned.
Of principal
interest to Ebenezer's posterity, of
course, is the question of the status
of his children. Children of
common-law unions in the early 1800s
were generally considered as being
inherently legitimate if the children
- as were Ebenezer's - were reared in
a family relationship in which no
otherwise legal wife was involved,
received their father's
acknowledgement of paternity, and were
given his name. Their legal status, in
such case, was no different from that
of children of unions which had been
more formally contracted. Attendant
stigma, if any, was essentially social
in nature, since the religious ethic
which dominated public attitudes among
most residents of the area tended to
view extra-church marriages and their
issue as somewhat déclassé.
There is some
evidence (and an insistent family
tradition) that Ebenezer father
children other than those named in his
will, presumably by other women of the
area. If this was indeed the case,
they would have comprised an
illegitimate line, even by the
tolerant standards of the time, and
would not have borne the Shields name.
There is some indication in the
records of the area that one or more
such children, if they did exist,
later may have adopted the family
name. Evidence in this regard is
inconclusive, however, and for
purposes of this work any such descent
is not regarded as a part of the line
herein treated.
It is
regrettable, but perhaps inevitable,
that lacking such other details of
Ebenezer's life as his physical
description (a daguerreotype which,
developed in Paris by 1829, had not
reached the Maryland foothills by
Ebenezer's time), or knowledge of his
more conventional personality traits,
the major emphasis of this chapter
must necessarily focus upon those
personal arrangements and
relationships which, in the final
analysis, represent only one small
aspect of his total career.
Ebenezer
Shields died on July 1, 1837, at the
age of 58. Family tradition ascribes
his demise to "summer pneumonia,"
although it is known from his will
that for some months prior to his
death he was in ill health, and very
likely bedridden. The nature of his
other debilities, if any, is not
known. He is buried in the Shields
family burial ground in Hampton
Valley, west of Emmitsburg - the only
one of William's eleven children known
to have been buried in the family plot
in which William Shields himself was
interred.
Ebenezer's
last consort, Margaret Morrison, is
not believed to have survived him by
many years; nothing is known, however,
of the date or cause of her death or
her place of burial.
Do
you know of an individual who helped shape Emmitsburg?
If so, send their story to us at: history@emmitsburg.net